How Do You Protect Against Market Drops?
In this episode of The Informed Investor podcast: Dimensional’s Mark Gochnour, Head of Global Client Services, Wes Crill, Senior Client Solutions Director, and Jake DeKinder, Head of Client Communications, analyze the allure of buffered strategies as well as the risks and costs of seeking downside protection.
Published August 28, 2025.
Episode 9: Enticing pitches for “buffered” strategies promise protection against downside risks in stocks. Are they worth it? Should investors sacrifice some upside for lowering the risks of losing money?
So-called “defined outcome strategies” offer a way to hedge downside equity risk in exchange for lower participation during market upswings.
There is typically a downside protection amount (the “buffer”), ranging from 10% to 100%, and a capped potential upside over a set period, typically one year.
The income potential of these strategies may be attractive for some investors, and softening the blow during equity market downturns is appealing for most investors. But there is more than one way of targeting downside protection.
Historically, fixed income investments across a wide range of sectors have had a positive average return when equities have had a negative return. Since 1976, for example, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index had an average return of 4.53% in years when the S&P 500 Index had a negative return.
Some may question the diversification benefit of fixed income based on recent episodes where stocks and bonds moved in the same direction, like 2022. But it’s important to remember that volatility reduction in portfolios from an allocation to fixed income has been largely unconnected to whether the returns of stocks and bonds moved in the same or opposite directions.
Buffered strategies and traditional equity/fixed income allocations both aim to provide downside protection at the cost of upside participation. The tradeoff between upside participation and downside exposure is comparable whether using defined outcome strategies or a simple mix of stocks and bonds.
What’s not similar between these two approaches is the overall performance—in the five-year period ending June 30, 2025, a 60% stocks/40% bonds strategy outgained several types of buffered strategies, which typically come with higher fees.
TIMESTAMPS
00:00 Intro
00:14 The headlines
01:00 What are buffered ETFs
01:17 Popularity of derivative income, defined outcome, equity hedged categories
01:39 Managing fear and greed
02:47 Targeting income with downside risk strategies
03:59 Tradeoffs between upside potential and downside protection
05:01 How do buffered strategies accomplish their goals
05:29 Appeal of balanced strategies
06:32 Ease of access to new investment options
07:05 Expense ratios and returns of buffered strategies vs. S&P 500 index funds
09:20 Questions to ask when evaluating any investment
10:33 Impact of bonds in a portfolio
11:05 Global 60/40 index vs. buffered strategies
11:29 Taxes on income from buffered strategies
13:08 Key takeaways
Beacon Hill Private Wealth is an independent, fee-only, fiduciary investment advisor providing evidence-based wealth planning solutions that simplify our clients' financial lives. Founder Tom Geoghegan, CFP®, CIMA®, CPWA®, RMA® is also a member of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA).
The information provided is educational and general in nature and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, specific investment, tax, or legal advice. Individuals should seek advice from their wealth advisor or other advisors before undertaking actions in response to the matters discussed. No client or prospective should assume the above information serves as the receipt of, or substitute for, personalized individual advice.
This reflects the opinions of Beacon Hill Private Wealth or its representatives, may contain forward-looking statements, and presents information that may change. Nothing contained in this communication may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or representation as to the future. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions can vary widely over time, and certain market and economic events having a positive impact on performance may not repeat themselves. Investing involves risk, including, but not limited to, loss of principal. Beacon Hill Private Wealth's opinions may change over time due to market conditions and other factors. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.