More Than Passive: The Critical Decisions That Influence Your Portfolio

Indexing Is a Series of Active Decisions

In the world of investing, "indexing" is often seen as a passive, hands-off strategy—a way to track the broad market without much ongoing decision-making. However, this view oversimplifies the realities of how indexing works. In truth, indexing involves a series of active decisions made by investors, index providers, and index fund managers. These decisions, while not always visible, significantly impact the performance, risks, and overall investment experience of index fund investors.

Investors' Role in Active Decision-Making

As an investor, you play a crucial role in shaping the composition of your index portfolio through several key decisions:

Choosing Asset Classes and Styles: Investors must determine which asset classes (equities, bonds, etc.) and styles (value, growth, small-cap, large-cap, etc.) they wish to be exposed to. These decisions directly influence the risk and return potential of a portfolio.
Selecting the Index: Not all indices are created equal. Different providers use different methodologies, meaning investors must actively choose which index (or combination of indices) best represents their desired exposures.
Benchmarks and Performance Tracking: Deciding which benchmarks to use for evaluating performance is another active choice. This is crucial for assessing whether the chosen index is delivering the expected outcomes.

Despite the perception of passivity, each of these decisions actively shapes the portfolio's future returns and risk profile.

Active Decisions by Index Providers

The choices made by index providers have significant implications for the characteristics of index funds. These decisions include:

Stock and Country Inclusion: Providers decide which countries and stocks to include in their indices. For example, the decision to classify a country as emerging or developed can lead to vastly different exposures in global funds. South Korea, for instance, is classified as an emerging market in some indices but as a developed market in others.
Rebalancing Frequency: Rebalancing decisions are critical. Indices are typically rebalanced on a fixed schedule (e.g., annually or quarterly). However, the frequency of rebalancing can affect tracking errors, style drift, and costs for investors. Rebalancing too frequently can drive up trading costs, while rebalancing too infrequently can lead to portfolios that deviate from their target market exposures.
Methodology for Additions and Deletions: When stocks are added to or removed from an index, the timing can have a substantial impact on returns. Tesla, for example, was only added to the S&P 500 in late 2020, after delivering significant returns throughout the year. Differences in index methodologies can lead to performance gaps between indices.

These choices are far from passive; they actively shape how the index reflects market changes and ultimately impact the returns that investors experience.

Active Decisions by Index Managers

Even after index providers design their indices, index fund managers must make active decisions about how to implement them:

Trading for Index Reconstitution: Managers decide how and when to buy or sell stocks to match index changes, balancing the need for low tracking error with the goal of minimizing transaction costs. If many index funds are forced to trade the same stock at the same time, this can lead to price distortions and higher costs.
Managing Cash Flows: How managers handle cash inflows and outflows (e.g., from dividends or new investments) is another active process. Managers must decide how to deploy this capital in a way that keeps the fund aligned with its benchmark.
Balancing Tracking Error and Costs: To reduce costs, managers may allow small deviations from the index. However, minimizing tracking error too aggressively can lead to poor execution prices and higher costs in volatile markets.

These decisions are particularly important when indices are reconstituted—a process that involves adjusting the portfolio to reflect changes in the index's composition. Index managers must execute these changes in a way that minimizes costs and stays true to the target exposures.

The Hidden Costs of Indexing

While index funds are often lauded for their low expense ratios, there are hidden costs that investors may overlook:

Transaction Costs: The rebalancing process can incur substantial trading costs, especially when multiple funds track the same index and trade the same stocks at the same time.
Style Drift: Infrequent rebalancing can lead to style drift, where an index fund no longer accurately represents its intended asset class or style. This can happen when stocks grow or shrink in size, or move between value and growth categories, without being removed from the index.
Forced Buying and Selling: Index reconstitution can result in forced transactions that may occur at suboptimal prices, particularly if other investors are front-running the trades.

These costs don’t always show up in the expense ratios of index funds but can still detract from performance.

Improving Upon Traditional Indexing

While indexing offers many advantages, there are opportunities to refine the process. For investors who want to improve upon traditional indexing strategies, it’s worth considering approaches that:

Rebalance More Frequently: This helps to avoid style drift and ensures that the portfolio better reflects the intended market exposures.
Use Flexible Trading: By allowing more flexibility in how trades are executed, fund managers can reduce the costs associated with trading on reconstitution dates.
Emphasize Evidence-Based Factors: Some funds take a more flexible approach to index replication by tilting toward factors like profitability or valuation, which have been shown to deliver higher expected returns over time.

How Beacon Hill Private Wealth Utilizes an Evidence-Based Approach

At Beacon Hill Private Wealth, we integrate an evidence-driven investment philosophy into every aspect of portfolio construction and management. Our approach is centered on the belief that markets are efficient over the long term and that broad diversification, cost-consciousness, and evidence-based factors are the most reliable drivers of long-term investment success. Here’s how we apply this approach:

Diversification Across Global Markets: We utilize globally diversified portfolios to spread risk and capture returns from a wide range of asset classes. This is based on decades of financial research showing that diversification improves long-term risk-adjusted returns.
Focusing on Factors That Drive Returns: We incorporate factors such as small-cap, value, and profitability tilts into our portfolios because research shows that these factors have historically delivered higher expected returns. This aligns with our commitment to evidence-based investing, supported by extensive academic studies.
Cost Efficiency and Tax Optimization: We are deeply committed to managing costs and taxes, as they are two of the most significant factors that reduce returns over time. By using low-cost, tax-efficient investment vehicles, we help clients keep more of what they earn.
Flexibility and Rebalancing: Our portfolio management approach involves continuous monitoring and rebalancing. We use a flexible strategy that allows us to make adjustments when markets move, without being forced to follow a rigid schedule. This enables us to manage trading costs and avoid the forced buying and selling that can erode returns.

We believe that following this evidence-driven approach provides our clients with a reliable way to achieve their financial goals, while minimizing unnecessary risk and cost. For us, investing is about staying disciplined, relying on academic research, and making decisions grounded in data—not speculation.

Conclusion

Indexing, far from being a passive process, is built on a foundation of active decisions made by investors, index providers, and fund managers. These decisions shape the characteristics of index funds, impact performance, and introduce hidden costs. At Beacon Hill, we take this a step further by applying an evidence-based investment philosophy that focuses on diversification, factor-based investing, cost-efficiency, and flexibility. By understanding the active nature of indexing and adopting a disciplined approach, investors can achieve better long-term outcomes.

Beacon Hill Private Wealth is an independent, fee-only, fiduciary investment advisor providing evidence-based wealth planning solutions that simplify our clients' financial lives. We serve clients in the state of New Jersey and across the country.

Founder Tom Geoghegan, CFP®, CIMA®, CPWA®, RMA® is also a member of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA), the Financial Planning Association (FPA), and featured on the Fee-Only Network.

We welcome the opportunity to learn more about your unique circumstances and share how Beacon Hill adds value to our clients' lives. Ready to talk? Simply schedule a phone call or virtual meeting using our Calendly booking tool.

For informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Certain information is based on third-party data and may become outdated or otherwise superseded without notice. Third-party information is deemed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) nor any other federal or state agency have approved, determined the accuracy, or confirmed the adequacy of this article. Please be advised that Beacon Hill Private Wealth only shares video and content through our website, Facebook, LinkedIn page, and other official sources. We do not post investment advice on WhatsApp, Telegram, other interactive applications, or other similar platforms. Rather, Beacon Hill Private Wealth provides investment advice only through individualized interactions.

Image by JDS_Pictures from Pixabay.