Hedge Fund Performance Update: Q1, 2019
Hedge funds entered this year coming off their 10th straight year of trailing the return of the S&P 500 Index. And as you can see in the following table, over the 10-year period ending 2018, they underperformed every single major equity asset class by wide margins. They also outperformed virtually riskless one-year Treasuries by less than 1%, and underperformed intermediate and long-term Treasuries.
|10 Years Through|
December 2018 (%)
|HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index||1.5|
|MSCI US Small Cap 1750 (gross dividends)||13.3|
|MSCI US Prime Market Value (gross dividends)||11.4|
|MSCI US Small Cap Value (gross dividends)||11.9|
|Dow Jones Select REIT||12.0|
|MSCI EAFE (net dividends)||6.3|
|MSCI EAFE Small Cap (net dividends)||10.5|
|MSCI EAFE Small Value (net dividends)||10.1|
|MSCI EAFE Value (net dividends)||5.5|
|MSCI Emerging Markets (net dividends)||8.0|
|Merrill Lynch One-Year Treasury Note||0.6|
|Five-Year Treasury Notes||2.0|
|20-Year Treasury Bonds||3.7|
With that perspective, we’ll review their performance over the first three months of 2019, in which the HFRX Global Hedge Fund Indexreturned 2.13%, 0.63%, and -0.17%, respectively, producing a total return of 2.6%.
|1st Quarter 2019|
|HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index||2.6|
|MSCI US Small Cap 1750 (gross dividends)||15.2|
|MSCI US Prime Market Value (gross dividends)||11.6|
|MSCI US Small Cap Value (gross dividends)||12.9|
|Dow Jones Select REIT||15.7|
|MSCI EAFE (net dividends)||10.0|
|MSCI EAFE Small Cap (net dividends)||10.7|
|MSCI EAFE Small Value (net dividends)||9.0|
|MSCI EAFE Value (net dividends)||7.9|
|MSCI Emerging Markets (net dividends)||9.9|
|Merrill Lynch One-Year Treasury Note||0.8|
|Five-Year Treasury Notes||3.2|
|20-Year Treasury Bonds||10.0|
As you can see, the hedge fund index underperformed every major equity asset class, and two of the three bond indexes. However, we can take our analysis a step further and determine how hedge funds performed against a globally diversified portfolio.
An all-equity portfolio allocated 50% internationally and 50% domestically, equally weighted among the indexes from the table within those broader categories, would have returned 11.7%, outperforming the hedge fund index by 9.1 percentage points.
Another comparison we can make is to a typical balanced portfolio of 60% equities and 40% bonds. Using the same weighting methodology as above for the equity allocation, the portfolio would have returned 7.3% using one-year Treasuries (outperforming the hedge fund index by 4.7 percentage points), 8.3% using five-year Treasuries (outperforming the hedge fund index by 5.7 percentage points), and 11.0% using long-term Treasuries (outperforming the hedge fund index by 8.4 percentage points).
Given the results and the wide dispersion of returns between U.S. and international equities, one might think hedge funds would have used their freedom to move across asset classes, which they often tout as their big advantage, to better effect.
The problem is that the efficiency of the market, as well as the cost of the effort, can turn that supposed advantage into a handicap. Given the evidence on hedge funds’ underwhelming results, it’s a puzzle why they are still managing about $3 trillion in assets.
I’ll report back again on hedge fund performance after the second quarter.
Larry Swedroe is the director of research for The BAM Alliance.
This commentary originally appeared April 17, 2019 on EFT.com.
This material and any opinions contained are derived from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and the opinions based thereon are not guaranteed. The content of this publication is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice. By clicking on any of the links above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, and do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party Web sites. We are not responsible for the content, availability or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products or services available on or through them. The opinions expressed by the author are their own and may not accurately reflect those of Beacon Hill Private Wealth LLC. This article is for general information only and is not intended to serve as specific financial, accounting or tax advice.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee investment strategies will be successful. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. Investors should talk to their financial advisor prior to making any investment decision. There is always the risk that an investor may lose money. A long-term investment approach cannot guarantee a profit.